schansblog

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 12 October 2007

sub-prime mortgages I: the numbers

Posted on 09:49 by aryan
Shock waves, yes. But the extent? A relatively small number when compared to total homeowners. Numbers from Lew Uhler of the National Tax Limitation Committee (hat tip: Chuck Muth): There are 75 million (residential) homeowners, 50 million have mortgages, 250,000 have mortgage problems—.5% of that group. (Many of those who lost were investors.)


On investors, from Nick Timiraos of the Wall Street Journal: Investment properties account for 11% of subprime defaults nationwide, and up to one-quarter in Nevada, California, Arizona and Florida, according to an August study by the Mortgage Bankers Association.


The regional/Kentuckiana angle from Gregory Hall with the C-J, illustrating that those in KY and IN are struggling more than average.

Court-ordered foreclosures in Jefferson County are on track for a second straight record high this year as a nationwide upheaval in the mortgage market forces people throughout the region out of their homes.

High-risk loans get much of the blame for the national increase, officials said, as homeowners approved for loans despite shaky credit struggle to pay their monthly bills.

The situation is the same throughout Kentucky and Indiana. The Mortgage Bankers Association said yesterday that Kentucky is tied for 11th and Indiana is third in a national ranking based on the percentage of loans going into foreclosure during the April-June quarter.

According to a figure from the article which I can copy over, foreclosures rose from 437 in 1996 to about 1000 in 2000 to an about 3000 per year since 2003.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2007 (41)
    • ▼  October (41)
      • Toyota and Tech Advance
      • a very useful WSJ data-set on sub-prime/high-risk ...
      • it's much broader than you think: sub-prime/high-r...
      • Joe Huber!
      • sub-prime mortgages IV: policy possibilities going...
      • sub-prime mortgages III: the racial angle
      • sub-prime mortgages II: the moral/ethical angle (f...
      • sub-prime mortgages I: the numbers
      • Econ 101: Profits, Not Unions, Save Jobs
      • why payroll taxes for SS are such an important (ec...
      • voter ID
      • oooh....more fun with corn!
      • run the good race...NOT!
      • Pelosi's prayers
      • C-J goes negative on Clarence Thomas again...
      • principle vs. pragmatism: it's not yes/no, it's a ...
      • cartoon on racial tensions
      • the Religious Right on sexual ethics and public po...
      • the Unabomber, a member of ZZ-Top, or a biblical p...
      • unions only like it when...
      • two different views on Clarence Thomas
      • Hillary Clinton and Sandy Berger?! puh-leaze!
      • Bush on Islam...puh-leaze!
      • Schansberg welcomes Sodrel back to the race
      • Bingham on Bennett
      • comments on Hill's recent fund-raising letter
      • renters vs. owners?
      • ok, it's not silver, it's gold...
      • Kool-Aid, Indiana, trans-racial adoption, and bask...
      • Fletcher & Beshear's courageous stand...NOT!
      • David (McCarty) vs. Goliath
      • Howey updates solutions to property tax woes
      • drinking age: 18 vs. 21
      • pardon me...
      • Ogborn wins the Lottery...
      • Is Ron Paul moving into the top tier of Republican...
      • sounds just like our house...
      • should I have scooped Dan Davis about myself?
      • What teachers make...
      • JCPS continues to discriminate vs. individuals bas...
      • is it ok to accept stolen/govt funds?
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

aryan
View my complete profile