schansblog

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, 6 October 2007

Howey updates solutions to property tax woes

Posted on 06:13 by aryan
This week, Brian Howey updates potential solutions to the property tax fiasco...

On the timing and the sense of Daniels' general plan...

INDIANAPOLIS - Two property tax proposals - by the Indiana Farm Bureau and Indiana Association of Realtors - were floated late last month. But the real drama will come later this month. That's when Gov. Mitch Daniels will weigh in, selecting one of several plans now before him. Several observers I've has talked with believe that the governor and a rather complex plan Sen. Luke Kenley is currently floating will likely meld together. Look for circuit-breakers, a shift to sales and/or income taxes, and moving assessing duties from townships to counties as almost certain hallmarks of any such plan. One source suggested that an income tax increase is giving the governor heartburn. He is said to desire a simplified system...

Lt. Gov. Becky Skillman told the Columbus Republic, "I expect the 2008 session to be consumed by the property tax debate. The governor will have a proposal on the table. It should be announced within the next 30 days or so. He talks regularly with the legislative leaders to try to reach some consensus on a long-term plan."...

The October unveiling is critical to give legislators time to react with their constituents to any plan prior to November's legislative Organization Day...

On the connection to local government and government spending in general...

At Valparaiso University, Gov. Daniels told students there he is thinking about seeking spending caps in the Indiana Constitution. A long-term approach would include the local government reorganization that is being researched by the Kernan-Shepard Commission. Gov. Daniels has said repeatedly that property tax and government reform are inextricably linked...

According to estimates by the Legislative Services Agency, net property taxes in Indiana grew between 2006 and 2007 by about $800 million - an increase of more than 14 percent. This is nearly six times the current inflation rate of 2.36 percent. In contrast, the previous two years saw a combined increase of $470 million...

Howey's conclusion...

Any legislator who thinks maintaining the status quo or applying another bandage will run the risk of ... unemployment. Having said that, any new system is likely to have a little castor oil for everyone. My advice: pay attention, keep an open mind, take in as much information as you can, resist making this a Republican vs. Democrat issue, and don't leap to conclusions.


I'm not usually optimistic about the ability of the general public to overcome bad policy through their elected governments. But this event has a key catalyst for significant change: an existing policy that substantially irritates a lot of people, especially when it's been going on for a long time. But there is reason to think that we'll end up with something less: the complexity of the topic, the continuing activity of narrow special interests (e.g., farmers), and the existence of broad special interests (renters vs. homeowners).
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2007 (41)
    • ▼  October (41)
      • Toyota and Tech Advance
      • a very useful WSJ data-set on sub-prime/high-risk ...
      • it's much broader than you think: sub-prime/high-r...
      • Joe Huber!
      • sub-prime mortgages IV: policy possibilities going...
      • sub-prime mortgages III: the racial angle
      • sub-prime mortgages II: the moral/ethical angle (f...
      • sub-prime mortgages I: the numbers
      • Econ 101: Profits, Not Unions, Save Jobs
      • why payroll taxes for SS are such an important (ec...
      • voter ID
      • oooh....more fun with corn!
      • run the good race...NOT!
      • Pelosi's prayers
      • C-J goes negative on Clarence Thomas again...
      • principle vs. pragmatism: it's not yes/no, it's a ...
      • cartoon on racial tensions
      • the Religious Right on sexual ethics and public po...
      • the Unabomber, a member of ZZ-Top, or a biblical p...
      • unions only like it when...
      • two different views on Clarence Thomas
      • Hillary Clinton and Sandy Berger?! puh-leaze!
      • Bush on Islam...puh-leaze!
      • Schansberg welcomes Sodrel back to the race
      • Bingham on Bennett
      • comments on Hill's recent fund-raising letter
      • renters vs. owners?
      • ok, it's not silver, it's gold...
      • Kool-Aid, Indiana, trans-racial adoption, and bask...
      • Fletcher & Beshear's courageous stand...NOT!
      • David (McCarty) vs. Goliath
      • Howey updates solutions to property tax woes
      • drinking age: 18 vs. 21
      • pardon me...
      • Ogborn wins the Lottery...
      • Is Ron Paul moving into the top tier of Republican...
      • sounds just like our house...
      • should I have scooped Dan Davis about myself?
      • What teachers make...
      • JCPS continues to discriminate vs. individuals bas...
      • is it ok to accept stolen/govt funds?
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

aryan
View my complete profile