Toyota Motor Corp. has shown reporters in Japan a hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle that has more than twice the range of its present FC model -- thanks to more onboard fuel storage. The increase, to 484 miles from 205 miles came after Toyota engineers installed new, larger hydrogen fuel tanks...The new tanks hold fuel that's pumped in at a higher pressure —for more density—than before...The range would make Toyota’s fuel-cell vehicle competitive with most conventional gasoline vehicles in terms of range between fueling stops.
Fuel cells, which convert hydrogen and oxygen to electricity that can be used to power traction motors for electric cars, are being developed by most major automakers as they search for pollution-free alternatives to today’s petroleum-burning cars and trucks. While production of hydrogen consumes energy and creates emissions at the fuel-making stage, the only tailpipe emission from fuel-cell motor vehicles is a dribble of distilled water.
Lack of a hydrogen fueling infrastructure, however, is likely to hold back widespread use of fuel-cell vehicles one the technology is refined for mass produced cars and trucks.
![[Map]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vD2_jbIGMm82kuPoMq4tD7S947lAm9mT9AP7KoMR5NgVpm27TYDAbsVV0xKEjK0vv_2Uf7blzZcXdoTBFxwhHBBkGU0k1g8n6LNmWtBQREWOcPXeswtPoKA7XDrCiTrgJmicu7jAy8p6xk53E7GEkauSr2=s0-d)
Thanks Kurt for posting this. A number of things on which we should be able to agree:
-Homosexuality is defined biblically as a sin. But if not confronted properly, this is a sin as well (E.g., the "preacher" from Kansas who goes to funerals for homosexuals with signs saying "God hates fags").
-Same-sex marriage is an oxymoron and incoherent in a biblical worldview. But again, handling the issue appropriately is required of us as well.
-What Christians should do with both topics-- with respect to government activism-- is another question. For example, just because something is sin, it doesn't mean that Christians should seek to use govt as a means to godly ends. Too often, that's the only motivation/rationale Christians bring to the political table.
-Too often, we've come across as if homosexuality is the entire or primary concern within a Christian sexual ethic. (Why not much more on divorce, adultery, pre-marital sex, etc.?)
-Too often, we've come across as if "same-sex marriage" and abortion are the only important things within a Christian social ethic.
-Too often, Christians have ignored vital issues of economic justice. Some of this is understandable since the layperson has to "pick his spots". But "justice" issues are where our biblical case for activism is the strongest-- and outside of abortion, we're largely silent.
-The Religious Left does not cause many black eyes for the faith (in the world's eyes) because 1.) they aren't as large; 2.) they're fighting for good things (with poverty-- biblically and in the world's eyes); and 3.) although their policy prescriptions are often unethical and impractical, people often fail to understand this.
And finally, where we might disagree:
-The Religious Right is prone to cause black eyes for the faith (in the world's eyes) because 1.) they are large/public; 2.) they're using govt to pursue a mixed bag of things (e.g., gambling)-- biblically, and certainly, in the world's eyes; and 3.) people often see their policy prescriptions as unethical (by their norms) and impractical.
Govt is a powerful but dangerous tool. Scripture warns of this. And people don't like being told what to do. So, we must take great care to invoke govt when it is most appropriate-- and to do so appropriately. Else, we risk unnecessary damage to God's Kingdom and we erect non-Cross barriers to those who might otherwise enter.